E-Hazard

It's a balanced setup rather than a pure speed machine. In MTB terms, the score is mostly about momentum on flats and climbs, rather than jump or drop capability. Several build choices play a role, including a heavier build, wheel momentum that helps it carry speed between pedal strokes, typical trail-width tires, and a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value.

If your rides include hills, it rates 3.0/10 for climbing. Within e-mountain bikes, this comes out below average. On steep gradients, you’ll be grinding more than spinning. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 28.8 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~7% for low-gear climbing. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. With roughly 25.8 kg under you, you’ll feel the weight on longer climbs even with a decent low gear. The motor support helps you keep rolling when the slope kicks up. Expect more grinding on climbs than easy spinning. Real-world feel depends on setup and size, and some details aren’t always listed, so this is best seen as a well-informed estimate.

On suspension support it’s 5/10, marked “Confident trail control”. This usually points to stronger bump control and steadier tracking when the surface gets choppy. It’s a common compromise: calmer front wheel, efficient rear end. Expect more grip and stability compared with basic bump-control setups. Not every manufacturer lists complete suspension numbers, so the explanation relies on the suspension layout and what’s normal for this category. It should keep the bike more controlled on mixed surfaces, especially through repeated small-to-medium impacts.

Balanced fit - a neutral road posture that suits most riders. You get this posture because bar height comes out ~83 mm below the saddle (large), with about 596 mm of forward reach - a very long stretch. Plan for roughly 35 degrees of lean. Spacer height is roughly 16 mm.

In E-bikeMountain, What drives the fit flexibility here: The cockpit is modular (separate stem and handlebar), so it is easier to adjust or swap fit parts. Also, The front-end is easier to work on, supporting fit tweaks over time. That is why it is in the Adjustable bucket. This mainly reflects how easy it is to adjust or swap key fit parts over time.

Comfort comes out to 6.3/10, which usually translates to a nicely smooth ride. That’s why it’s labeled Firm. It’s running about 58 mm tires on 700c wheels, and the high-volume tires add a lot of damping and grip on roots, rocks, braking bumps, and repeated hits. The posture is neutral (posture 6/10, torso ~35°), which keeps it balanced — not overly aggressive, not overly relaxed.

Overall, this feels reasonably priced. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec estimate, the price is close to what we’d expect for a comparable build. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 40% of listings). To anchor it: price €4.094 versus an estimated €3.939 for a similar build. Put simply: you’re paying roughly what similar bikes tend to cost.

This setup is aimed at fast trail riding on less extreme terrain. It has about 100 mm of suspension travel (how much it absorbs bumps), which suits smoother trails. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.