JAM ² 6.9

For mountain riding, it captures how the bike carries speed when you're pushing the pedals on less technical surfaces. The score is largely shaped by typical trail-width tires and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. Add it all up and you get a clear tilt toward speed or toward utility. When you're pedaling, the tire setup is biased toward rolling speed on firm ground.

If your rides include hills, it rates 1.0/10 for climbing. Within e-mountain bikes, it sits near the bottom. On steep gradients, you’ll be grinding more than spinning. That lowest gear comes out around 72.0 gear inches. Most comparable bikes have an easier low gear; this is easier than only about ~1% of them. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. The motor support helps you keep rolling when the slope kicks up. This is happiest on flatter terrain; steep stuff will feel demanding. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

Suspension performance: 8/10. It’s grouped into “High-impact ready”. It typically supports higher-speed rough sections where impacts stack up quickly. Full suspension means both ends can absorb impacts, helping the wheels track rough ground more consistently. It prioritizes stability at speed on rough ground. On choppy terrain, it can help the wheels track more consistently. This is meant for rougher terrain where repeated impacts demand stable wheel tracking.

Sporty fit - you'll lean forward more and feel ready to push the pace. It feels this way because bar height comes out ~45 mm below the saddle (moderate), with about 642 mm of forward reach - a extreme stretch. You'll likely be near 28 degrees of lean. Front-end spacers are estimated around 14 mm.

That is why we tag it Moderately Adjustable. Fit adjustability is shaped by a few key choices: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, Internal routing looks tidy but can make cockpit changes a bit more fiddly, and Standard seatpost sizing improves compatibility for different setbacks and lengths. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

Comfort comes out to 8.3/10, which usually translates to a highly forgiving ride. It’s tagged Balanced for Enduro — it feels highly forgiving overall, but it’s on the firmer end compared with the plushest Enduro builds. The posture is forward, attacking (posture 7/10), which loads the front wheel, which feels great for control but a bit more direct through the bars.

This looks like strong value, even if it’s not the absolute cheapest listing. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec estimate, the price is close to what we’d expect for a comparable build. In its peer group, it tends to be better-priced than many, beating about 75% of listings. To anchor it: price €6.312 versus an estimated €6.527 for a similar build. Not every spec detail is consistently published, so think of this as a strong hint rather than the last word. Overall, it looks like a strong buy in its category.

This bike is built for rougher, more technical trails where control matters. It has about 150 mm of suspension travel (how much it absorbs bumps), which helps on rough, technical trails. The Full setup supports this riding style.