E-765 OPTIMUM Metallic Blue Glossy

This road-speed measure focuses on efficient pace on asphalt, where drag and rolling resistance matter most. Even on an e-bike, the rating is driven by the bike's setup - tires, weight, and build choices - rather than the motor alone.

Climbing rating: 4.8/10. Within e-road bikes, it lands around the middle. The easiest gear is on the tall side for proper hills. That lowest gear comes out around 28.7 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~33% for low-gear climbing. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. With about 13.9 kg to haul uphill, pacing matters more on longer grades. Being an e-bike helps on climbs because the assist adds steady push when you need it. It can climb, but you’ll likely prefer smoother pacing on longer hills. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

Aero-wise, at 5.8/10, it sits in the ‘good enough everywhere’ aero zone so it feels ‘quick enough’ without being a pure aero build. In everyday language, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. That typically means solid everyday speed without forcing an aggressive position or race-only parts. Small setup choices (wheels, tyres, cockpit) can shift how aero it feels on the road. Not every brand publishes the same detail, so this leans on the clearest available specs.

Comfort fit - less tuck and easier on neck and shoulders. Because the cockpit sits 67 mm below the saddle (a moderate drop), and the cockpit stretches you forward by ~556 mm (long). Estimated lean is about 33 degrees. Endurance bikes often keep the front end a bit higher for longer rides.

In E-bikeRoad / Endurance, Fit flexibility summary: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical. Also, The listed seatpost details do not show clear restrictions or extra flexibility signals. Overall, it falls into Adjustable. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

Ride comfort is 5.0/10 — on a real ride it feels balanced. So it’s tagged Balanced overall. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10, torso ~33°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

For the spec, this is priced well into premium territory. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 31% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 10% of them. To anchor it: price €6.200 versus an estimated €4.748 for a similar build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Put simply: it’s priced more like a premium pick than a value buy.

This setup is made for real-world roads with cracks and patches. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.