E-765 OPTIMUM Proteam Black Glossy

For road-style bikes, the score is a proxy for how fast the build feels on normal pavement. With pedal assist, the bike's tires and overall resistance still shape how fast it feels, and this score follows that idea. A few practical factors stand out: all-round road tires that balance speed and comfort, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding, and...

If your rides include hills, it rates 2.6/10 for climbing. Within e-road bikes, it ranks below average. You may find yourself pushing a bit more on steeper grades. Your easiest gear lands around 28.7 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~33% versus similar bikes. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. The motor support helps you keep rolling when the slope kicks up. A good middle-ground if you want mixed routes that include some hills. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

For an endurance build, an aero score of 5.8/10 means that it’s an all-round aero level so it’s more efficient than it looks once you’re rolling. In everyday language, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. Different categories trade aerodynamics against comfort and stability—endurance is part of that story. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. Specs can vary by market and model year, so the summary follows the strongest published signals. In practice, it’s a balanced setup: decent in the wind without demanding big compromises elsewhere.

Comfort fit - comfort-leaning without feeling sluggish. That's driven by bar height comes out ~75 mm below the saddle (moderate), with about 539 mm of forward reach - a long stretch. Expect a lean angle around 35 degrees.

This rating is mainly driven by the parts that affect adjustability: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, Cable routing is on the simpler side, which helps adjustability - Seatpost details do not strongly point to a very locked-in or very flexible system. Net result: Adjustable. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

Ride comfort is 5.0/10 — on a real ride it feels balanced. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10, torso ~35°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

In simple terms, it comes out as ‘about right’ for the category. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it’s about 13% above the typical level for similar builds. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 47% of listings). To anchor it: price €6.185 versus an estimated €5.474 for a similar build. Not every spec detail is consistently published, so think of this as a strong hint rather than the last word. Put simply: you’re paying roughly what similar bikes tend to cost.

This is a road bike that stays comfortable when the pavement gets rough. The tire size is unknown in this entry, so the surface range is based on the clearest available signals. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.