E-765 OPTIMUM Metallic Blue Glossy

This road-speed measure focuses on efficient pace on asphalt, where drag and rolling resistance matter most. Even on an e-bike, the rating is driven by the bike's setup - tires, weight, and build choices - rather than the motor alone.

On steep roads, it comes in at 4.8/10. Within e-road bikes, this comes out around the middle. On longer climbs, the gearing lands on the tall side. That lowest gear comes out around 28.7 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~33% of them. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. At roughly 13.9 kg, the bike’s heft shows up most on sustained climbs. The motor support helps you keep rolling when the slope kicks up. It can climb, but you’ll likely prefer smoother pacing on longer hills. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

As an endurance bike, at 5.8/10 for aerodynamics, it’s built to be well-rounded in the wind so it feels ‘quick enough’ without being a pure aero build. In everyday language, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. Specs can vary by market and model year, so the summary follows the strongest published signals. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either.

Comfort fit - less tuck and easier on neck and shoulders. Because the cockpit sits 74 mm below the saddle (a moderate drop), and the cockpit stretches you forward by ~549 mm (long). Estimated lean is about 34 degrees. Endurance bikes often keep the front end a bit higher for longer rides.

In E-bikeRoad / Endurance, Fit flexibility summary: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical. Also, The listed seatpost details do not show clear restrictions or extra flexibility signals. Overall, it falls into Adjustable. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

Comfort comes out to 5.0/10, which usually translates to a fairly neutral ride. That’s why it’s labeled Balanced. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10, torso ~34°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

The value looks a bit weak compared with similar options. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it’s about 17% above the typical level for similar builds. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 36% of listings). To anchor it: price €5.555 versus an estimated €4.748 for a similar build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Put simply: it’s a bit pricey for what you get.

This bike is road-focused, but it’s more forgiving on bumpy pavement. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.