E-765 OPTIMUM Proteam Black Glossy

For road-style bikes, the score is a proxy for how fast the build feels on normal pavement. With pedal assist, the bike's tires and overall resistance still shape how fast it feels, and this score follows that idea. A few practical factors stand out: a heavier build, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, all-round road tires that balance speed and comfort, and a solid drivetrain that supports...

Climbing rating: 4.8/10. Within e-road bikes, this comes out around the middle. On climbs, the lowest gear feels tall. Your easiest gear lands around 28.7 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~33% versus similar bikes. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. At roughly 13.6 kg, the bike’s heft shows up most on sustained climbs. Being an e-bike helps on climbs because the assist adds steady push when you need it. It can climb, but you’ll likely prefer smoother pacing on longer hills. Build kits can differ by size and spec level, and not every detail is published by every brand, so use this as a practical guideline.

Looking at it as an endurance setup, aero-wise, at 5.8/10, it’s built to be well-rounded in the wind so it feels versatile, not single-purpose. Put simply, it’s a balanced middle ground: some streamlining, but not an extreme aero setup. The endurance tag is a useful clue for how wind efficiency ranks among the priorities. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. It’s a middle-ground feel: not the fastest possible in the wind, but not holding you back either.

Comfort fit - comfort-leaning without feeling sluggish. That's driven by bar height comes out ~68 mm below the saddle (moderate), with about 546 mm of forward reach - a long stretch. Expect a lean angle around 33 degrees.

This rating is mainly driven by the parts that affect adjustability: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, Cable routing is on the simpler side, which helps adjustability - Seatpost details do not strongly point to a very locked-in or very flexible system. Net result: Adjustable. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

Comfort comes out to 5.0/10, which usually translates to a moderately comfortable ride. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. The posture is neutral (posture 5/10, torso ~33°), which balances comfort and responsiveness pretty well.

This looks expensive compared with similar bikes. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 28% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 15% of them. To anchor it: price €7.000 versus an estimated €5.474 for a similar build. Some manufacturer details aren’t fully published, so use this as a helpful direction rather than a final verdict. Bottom line: the price looks high for what’s included.

This setup is made for real-world roads with cracks and patches. The tire size is unknown in this entry, so the surface range is based on the clearest available signals. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.