795 Blade 105 Di2

On asphalt, it's mainly a question of resistance and efficiency, and that's what the score summarizes. The strongest influences are narrow road tires that keep resistance low, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding. So overall, it's built to carry momentum with less wasted effort.

Climb score: 2.8/10. Within Road bikes, it sits below average. The low gear is workable, but not super easy on steep ramps. Your easiest gear lands around 28.6 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~47% versus similar bikes. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. A good middle-ground if you want mixed routes that include some hills. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

In aero terms, with a 8.8/10 aero score, it’s at the sharp end of aero priorities with a clear speed-over-everything bias. Put simply, it’s strongly speed-focused, designed to reduce wind drag when you’re riding fast. The fit looks fairly neutral, so aerodynamics depends more on the overall design and components than on an extreme position. That tyre width is common on performance road builds and tends to suit aero goals. Details like hidden cables and a cleaner cockpit can add up to small aero gains at speed. Specs can vary by market and model year, so the summary follows the strongest published signals. The faster you ride, the more this aero focus tends to show up in how it holds speed.

Sporty fit - a performance-leaning position that encourages speed. This is mainly because there's about 111 mm of drop to the bars (large), with roughly 565 mm of forward stretch to the bar (long). You'll likely be near 41 degrees of lean.

In Road, That is why it is in the Adjustable bucket. Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, Cable routing is on the simpler side, which helps adjustability. At the same time, Seatpost info looks fairly neutral, so most fit change comes from cockpit choices.

Comfort comes out to 2.1/10, which usually translates to a stiff-feeling ride. So it’s tagged Race-Stiff overall. It’s running about 25 mm tires on 700c wheels, and you feel more of the road texture with narrow tires on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10, torso ~41°), which puts more weight forward, so you notice more feedback through the hands and saddle.

This feels like you’re paying extra for the same kind of bike. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it’s about 22% above the typical level for similar builds. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 52% of listings). Quick reference: €7.130 listed versus about €5.863 for a comparable build. Bottom line: you may be paying extra versus similar options.

This bike is best when your rides stay on clean tarmac. Tires around 25 mm usually mean it’s tuned for smooth-road speed. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.