795 BladeRS Dura Ace Di2

For road-style bikes, the score is a proxy for how fast the build feels on normal pavement. Compared with trail-speed specialists, this build is shaped by a baseline tire-width assumption, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, and a basic drivetrain spec that prioritizes practicality over outright performance.

Uphill performance score: 1.8/10. Within Road bikes, it sits near the bottom. The easiest gear is on the tall side for proper hills. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 32.4 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~18% of them. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. This is happiest on flatter terrain; steep stuff will feel demanding. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

In aero terms, with a 8.6/10 aero score, it’s a speed-first, wind-focused setup and it’s meant to pay you back at high speed. The short version is: it’s strongly speed-focused, designed to reduce wind drag when you’re riding fast. Different brands share different amounts of detail, so this uses the most consistent cues that are available. The faster you ride, the more this aero focus tends to show up in how it holds speed.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. This is mainly because there's about 112 mm of drop to the bars (large), with roughly 569 mm of forward stretch to the bar (long). You'll likely be near 41 degrees of lean. Aero intent typically nudges you into a sleeker position. Estimated spacers: ~10 mm.

In Road, Main reasons for the fit flexibility result: This front-end is not locked into a one-piece system, which helps adjustability, A more service-friendly routing setup makes changes easier; From the seatpost text provided, there are no strong constraints or bonuses. Overall, it falls into Adjustable. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

Ride comfort is 2.9/10 — on a real ride it feels firm. That’s why it’s labeled Firm. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10, torso ~41°), which puts more weight forward, so you notice more feedback through the hands and saddle.

This looks expensive compared with similar bikes. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 246% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 3% of them. Quick reference: €10.280 listed versus about €2.967 for a comparable build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Put simply: it’s priced more like a premium pick than a value buy.

This setup is focused on speed and efficiency on paved roads. The tire size is unknown in this entry, so the surface range is based on the clearest available signals. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.