795 BladeRs Grey Nardo Glossy

For road bikes, the speed score favors setups that waste less energy at higher speeds. Compared with trail-speed specialists, this build is shaped by narrow road tires that keep resistance low, an aero-leaning setup that reduces drag at higher speeds, and a high-end drivetrain that tends to feel crisp under load. This means it's set up to reward hard efforts with higher cruising speed.

On steep roads, it comes in at 1.3/10. Within Road bikes, this comes out near the bottom. For hill work, the easiest gear is very tall. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 33.5 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~7% versus similar bikes. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. On proper hills, you’ll feel it — this setup isn’t built to make climbing effortless. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

As an aero bike, on ~47mm wheels, scoring 9.7/10 on aero, it’s designed around going fast in exposed conditions with a clear speed-over-everything bias. The short version is: it’s strongly speed-focused, designed to reduce wind drag when you’re riding fast. The aero tag is a useful clue for how wind efficiency ranks among the priorities. A lower front end can help you tuck in a bit, even if the bike itself isn’t built as an aero specialist. Rims around 47mm are more of an all-round choice than a pure aero choice. These wheels lean more toward stability and versatility than pure aero. That tyre width is common on performance road builds and tends to suit aero goals. Details like hidden cables and a cleaner cockpit can add up to small aero gains at speed. Different brands share different amounts of detail, so this uses the most consistent cues that are available. On fast flats and windy days, it’s built to feel like it wastes less energy pushing air.

Sporty fit - you'll lean forward more and feel ready to push the pace. This is mainly because there's about 112 mm of drop to the bars (large), with roughly 569 mm of forward stretch to the bar (long). Estimated lean is about 41 degrees.

What drives the fit flexibility here: Standard cockpit parts make it simpler to fine-tune your position over time, The front-end is easier to work on, supporting fit tweaks over time. Plus, This seatpost design is more specific than a round standard post, which reduces flexibility. That is why we tag it Moderately Adjustable.

This scores 2.1/10 for comfort, so it feels harsh on rough surfaces out on the road. That’s why it’s labeled Race-Stiff. It’s running about 25 mm tires on 700c wheels, and narrow tires usually mean higher pressure, so more buzz comes through on chipseal and broken pavement. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10, torso ~41°), which puts more weight forward, so you notice more feedback through the hands and saddle.

The price looks hard to justify versus similar options. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 114% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 13% of them. To anchor it: price €13.641 versus an estimated €6.361 for a similar build. Bottom line: the price looks high for what’s included.

This bike is best when your rides stay on clean tarmac. The tire size is around 25 mm, which is typical for fast road setups. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.