795 BladeRs Thunder Blue Satin

For road riding, the score leans toward outright pace rather than comfort-first priorities. In practice, it aims for an all-round feel more than maximum speed. The strongest influences are typical road tire sizing assumptions, aerodynamics that likely help it hold speed once you're rolling, and a basic drivetrain spec that prioritizes practicality over outright performance.

Climbing rating: 1.8/10. Within Road bikes, it ranks near the bottom. The easiest gear is on the tall side for proper hills. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 32.4 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~18% of them. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. This is happiest on flatter terrain; steep stuff will feel demanding. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

On the aero side of things, scoring 8.6/10 on aero, it’s very clearly optimized for windy, fast terrain so the faster you ride, the more it shows. In everyday language, it’s strongly speed-focused, designed to reduce wind drag when you’re riding fast. This setup supports a more race-leaning posture, helping you present less of your body to the wind. If you ride at higher speeds, this is the kind of bike that’s designed to pay you back for that effort.

Sporty fit - more tuck for efficiency, but still manageable for many riders. Because bars are around 112 mm lower than the saddle, which is a large drop, and the forward stretch measures around 569 mm (long). Expect a lean angle around 41 degrees. Aero intent typically nudges you into a sleeker position. Spacer height is roughly 10 mm.

Net result: Adjustable. Here is the simple reasoning behind the fit flexibility rating: Standard cockpit parts make it simpler to fine-tune your position over time. At the same time, The front-end is easier to work on, supporting fit tweaks over time. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

Comfort comes out to 2.9/10, which usually translates to a firm ride. That’s why it’s labeled Firm. The posture is race-leaning (posture 7/10, torso ~41°), which tends to feel more direct, especially over rougher sections.

This is priced well above what we’d usually expect for a similar setup. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 279% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 1% of them. To anchor it: price €10.280 versus an estimated €2.711 for a similar build. A few manufacturer details aren’t clearly published, so treat this as a best-effort estimate, not a precise verdict. Overall, you can likely find better value elsewhere.

This bike is best when your rides stay on clean tarmac. Tire size details aren’t available here, so the label follows the overall setup and category cues. Wheel choice (700c) fits the kind of surfaces this bike targets.