E-160 S MX

It's more about stability and usefulness than feeling fast. On trails, this rating is about rolling speed and momentum, not suspension feel or handling sharpness. The score is largely shaped by typical trail-width tires, wheel momentum that helps it carry speed between pedal strokes, and a solid drivetrain that supports efficient riding.

If your rides include hills, it rates 5.1/10 for climbing. Within e-mountain bikes, it ranks around the middle. On climbs, the lowest gear feels easy. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 20.9 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~18% of them. Gear inches is basically “how easy is the easiest gear”. Lower numbers help you keep your legs spinning on steep bits. The motor support helps you keep rolling when the slope kicks up. It’s set up so climbs feel controlled rather than a grind. Build kits can differ by size and spec level, and not every detail is published by every brand, so use this as a practical guideline.

Suspension score: 8/10. It sits in the “High-impact ready” bucket. That usually means it’s built for harder hits and rougher trails with steadier wheel tracking. Both ends absorb impacts, improving how consistently the tires can follow rough terrain. On choppy terrain, it can help the wheels track more consistently. Some brands don’t publish full suspension measurements, so this summary follows the suspension layout and typical builds for this style. This is meant for rougher terrain where repeated impacts demand stable wheel tracking.

Balanced fit - a middle ground between comfort and speed. That's driven by the front end is very small, with ~33 mm of saddle-to-bar drop, with a extreme stretch forward at ~655 mm. Expect a lean angle around 26 degrees.

In E-bikeMountain / Enduro, So it lands in Moderately Adjustable. What drives the fit flexibility here: Standard cockpit parts make it simpler to fine-tune your position over time, Internal routing is a mild hit to swap-and-go adjustability - Seatpost info looks fairly neutral, so most fit change comes from cockpit choices. In practice, it is about how easy fit changes are with normal parts and service work.

This scores 8.3/10 for comfort, so it feels plush out on the road. It’s tagged Balanced for Enduro — it feels plush overall, but it’s on the firmer end compared with the plushest Enduro builds. The posture is forward, attacking (posture 7/10), which loads the front wheel, which feels great for control but a bit more direct through the bars.

It’s hard to see the value at this asking price. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 44% above what similar builds typically cost. In its peer group, it’s one of the pricier listings, beating only about 18% of them. Quick reference: €7.989 listed versus about €5.552 for a comparable build. Not every spec detail is consistently published, so think of this as a strong hint rather than the last word. Bottom line: the price looks high for what’s included.

This bike is built for rougher, more technical trails where control matters. It has about 160 mm of suspension travel (how much it absorbs bumps), which helps on rough, technical trails. The Full setup supports this riding style.