MIG e-S

This MTB speed measure favors setups that roll efficiently without sacrificing too much traction. On typical routes, it tends to feel slower when you try to hold a high tempo. The strongest influences are a heavier build, typical trail-width tires, and a capable drivetrain that supports steady speed. On hardpack, the tire setup is biased toward rolling speed on firm ground.

If your rides include hills, it rates 5.4/10 for climbing. Within e-mountain bikes, it sits around the middle. On climbs, the lowest gear feels easy. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 18.4 gear inches. Compared with similar bikes, this low gear is easier than about ~49% of them. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. With roughly 23.8 kg under you, you’ll feel the weight on longer climbs even with a decent low gear. Being an e-bike helps on climbs because the assist adds steady push when you need it. Good for keeping cadence steady on climbs without overcooking it. Different builds can shift the feel a bit, and some manufacturer specs aren’t always publicly listed, so consider this a helpful direction.

Suspension sits at 7/10, in “High-impact ready”. It’s designed to stay composed through rough sections and repeated hits. Full suspension means both ends can absorb impacts, helping the wheels track rough ground more consistently. This level is meant to keep the bike composed when hits are bigger and frequent. Expect stronger control when braking and cornering on rough terrain. Rough trails should feel more controlled, especially when hits stack up.

Balanced fit - a middle ground between comfort and speed. You get this posture because bars are around 54 mm lower than the saddle, which is a moderate drop, and the forward stretch measures around 613 mm (very long). Plan for roughly 30 degrees of lean.

This rating is mainly driven by the parts that affect adjustability: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, Less routing complexity makes swaps and adjustments more practical - A dropper makes it easier to shift between climbing and descending positions. That is why it is in the Adjustable bucket.

This scores 7.8/10 for comfort, so it feels very smooth out on the road. It’s tagged Balanced for Trail — it feels very smooth overall, but it’s on the firmer end compared with the plushest Trail builds. The posture is forward, attacking (posture 7/10, torso ~30°), which loads the front wheel, which feels great for control but a bit more direct through the bars.

Nothing screams bargain or rip-off here. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it’s about 10% above the typical level for similar builds. Among comparable bikes, it sits around the middle on price (cheaper than about 52% of listings). To anchor it: price €4.505 versus an estimated €4.100 for a similar build. Some manufacturer details aren’t fully published, so use this as a helpful direction rather than a final verdict. Put simply: you’re paying roughly what similar bikes tend to cost.

This bike is built for everyday trails with a mix of roots, rocks, and turns. It has about 140 mm of suspension travel (how much it absorbs bumps), which works well for everyday trails. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.