WILD ST H30 20mph

This off-road speed rating describes how quickly the bike rolls under pedal power on smoother ground. In comparison with more aero-focused bikes, this build is shaped by typical trail-width tires and a more budget-friendly drivetrain that focuses on value. When you're pedaling, the tire setup is biased toward rolling speed on firm ground (with a bit of defaulting).

Climb score: 8.6/10. Within e-mountain bikes, it lands near the top. On climbs, the lowest gear feels very easy. In numbers, the low gear is roughly 16.9 gear inches. On the ‘easier low gear’ scale, it sits around ~91% versus similar bikes. Think of “gear inches” like a difficulty score for your easiest gear: lower = more spin-friendly on climbs. E-assist can take the sting out of steep ramps, especially at lower speeds. This kind of low gear helps you stay smooth on long or steep climbs. Specs can vary by size and build, and some manufacturer details aren’t always published, so treat this as a strong guide rather than a guarantee.

For bump control, it’s 6/10 — “Confident trail control”. That typically means noticeably better bump absorption and more consistent tracking on rougher sections. Full suspension means both ends can absorb impacts, helping the wheels track rough ground more consistently. Expect more grip and stability compared with basic bump-control setups. Some brands don’t publish full suspension measurements, so this summary follows the suspension layout and typical builds for this style.

Balanced fit - a neutral road posture that suits most riders. Because the front end is moderate, with ~40 mm of saddle-to-bar drop, with a extreme stretch forward at ~642 mm. Plan for roughly 27 degrees of lean.

This rating is mainly driven by the parts that affect adjustability: A modular front-end gives more freedom to change stem length or bar width, The front-end is easier to work on, supporting fit tweaks over time; The dropper post improves on-the-fly position changes. So it lands in Moderately Adjustable. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

This scores 6.5/10 for comfort, so it feels comfortable out on the road. That’s the reason it lands as Balanced. The posture is forward, attacking (posture 7/10), which loads the front wheel, which feels great for control but a bit more direct through the bars.

This feels like you’re paying extra for the same kind of bike. Value is scored 1–10: higher is better value, lower means you’re paying more than similar bikes. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). On the spec comparison, it sits roughly 26% above what similar builds typically cost. Compared with similar bikes, it trends a little expensive (cheaper than about 25% of listings). Quick reference: €5.399 listed versus about €4.275 for a comparable build. Not every spec detail is consistently published, so think of this as a strong hint rather than the last word. Overall, it doesn’t look like the best value for the spec.

This setup is aimed at fast trail riding on less extreme terrain. Suspension travel details aren’t available here, so the label follows the category and the rest of the setup. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.