ECA 1

On trails, this rating is about rolling speed and momentum, not suspension feel or handling sharpness. Versus the most speed-focused options, this build is shaped by a heavier build, typical trail-width tires, and a capable drivetrain that supports steady speed. On hardpack, the tire setup is biased toward rolling speed on firm ground. All else equal, it's better suited to relaxed riding than pushing fast splits.

Overall on climbs: 4.8/10. Within e-mountain bikes, it sits around the middle. The low gear should feel friendly on most hills. The easiest gear works out to about 20.5 gear inches. In its peer group, it lands around the easier ~19% for low-gear climbing. “Gear inches” sounds nerdy, but it’s just a quick way to describe how easy your lowest gear is to turn uphill. Lower usually means easier. Weight is around 25.6 kg — on steep, slow climbs that extra mass becomes more noticeable. E-assist can take the sting out of steep ramps, especially at lower speeds. This kind of low gear helps you stay smooth on long or steep climbs. Build kits can differ by size and spec level, and not every detail is published by every brand, so use this as a practical guideline.

Suspension capability comes out at 8/10. Bucket: “High-impact ready”. That usually means it’s built for harder hits and rougher trails with steadier wheel tracking. Suspension at both ends helps keep wheel tracking steadier when the surface gets rough. It’s designed to stay composed when impacts come quickly one after another, especially at higher speeds.

Balanced fit - a neutral road posture that suits most riders. That's driven by you get a moderate drop: roughly 44 mm from saddle to bar, plus about 642 mm of stretch forward (extreme). Expect a lean angle around 28 degrees.

That is why it is in the Adjustable bucket. Fit adjustability is shaped by a few key choices: Because the bar and stem are separate, changing reach or bar shape is usually straightforward, The front-end is easier to work on, supporting fit tweaks over time. At the same time, Round, standard seatposts are generally easier to adjust and swap. Put simply, it describes how practical it is to reconfigure your position later.

This scores 8.4/10 for comfort, so it feels highly forgiving out on the road. It’s tagged Balanced for Enduro — it feels highly forgiving overall, but it’s on the firmer end compared with the plushest Enduro builds. It’s running about 60 mm tires on 29" wheels, and the big tires calm small hits and take the edge off trail chatter on roots, rocks, braking bumps, and repeated hits. The posture is forward, attacking (posture 7/10), which puts you in an attack stance, which can feel more intense on long, rough descents.

From a value angle, this comes out as a standout deal. The value score is 1–10. Higher means better value for money; lower means the price is high for what you get. Uses MSRP as a baseline; real-world prices can be lower (discounts can change the value). Based on the spec estimate, it comes in about 15% under the typical level for similar builds. Against similar bikes of the same type and age, it’s usually on the cheaper side, beating about 91% of listings. Quick reference: €5.193 listed versus about €6.142 for a comparable build. Bottom line: you’re getting a lot of bike for the money compared with typical options.

This bike is built for rougher, more technical trails where control matters. It has about 160 mm of suspension travel (how much it absorbs bumps), which helps on rough, technical trails. Overall, the setup matches this surface range well.